Comparison of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—third edition in economically disadvantaged African American youth

Author(s):  
Judy Johnson Grados ◽  
Kathleen A. Russo-Garcia
2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 921-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. McNally ◽  
Jennifer Rohan ◽  
Mark Schluchter ◽  
Kristin A. Riekert ◽  
Pamela Vavrek ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1111-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven O. Walters ◽  
Kenneth A. Weaver

The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test detects learning problems of young students and is a screen for whether a more comprehensive test of intelligence is needed. A study to assess whether this test was valid as an adult intelligence test was conducted with 20 undergraduate psychology majors. The correlations between the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test's Composite, Vocabulary, and Matrices test scores and their corresponding Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition test scores, the Full Scale ( r = .88), Verbal ( r = .77), and Performance scores ( r = .87), indicated very strong relationships. In addition, no significant differences were obtained between the Composite, Vocabulary, and Matrices means of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test and the Full Scale, Verbal, and Performance means of the WAIS–III. The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test appears to be a valid test of intelligence for adults.


Assessment ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L. Canivez

Concurrent validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with a sample of elementary- and middle-school students referred for multidisciplinary evaluations in a public school setting is presented. All correlations between the K-BIT and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition (WISC-III) were significant. Correlations ranged from .36 ( r2 = .10) to .87 ( r2 = .75), Mr = .71 ( Mr2 = .50). K-BIT Vocabulary-Matrices discrepancy scores accounted for a significant but small proportion (13%) of the variability in WISC-III VIQ-PIQ discrepancies, but kappa ( k) coefficients for these discrepancies indicated that agreement was generally no better than chance. The K-BIT appears to be a promising general intellectual screening instrument when more comprehensive assessment is not possible or needed, but interpretation is best left at the IQ Composite level for the present time.


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma M. Sterrett ◽  
Allison B. Dymnicki ◽  
David Henry ◽  
Gayle R. Byck ◽  
John Bolland ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document